As
we become more separated from ecological processes, it often seems entirely
natural and acceptable for us to treat our wood with an array of hazardous
chemicals. If we want a timber that will not be eaten by termites, we
make it poisonous to termites. If we want an imported rainforest timber
free of borer holes, we fumigate it with chemicals. If we want a timber
that will not rot, we impregnate it with chemicals. The piece of wood
we eventually purchase may have been exposed to a number of chemical
treatments before we get to install it in our home. It is this way of
thinking and acting that has led to the wide spread use of chemicals
in the forest products industry.
In
the following sections we examine some of chemical processes most commonly
used within the wood products industry. It has not been an easy section
to write for, as mere consumers, we have been deliberately excluded
from knowing too much about the chemicals used by the wood products
industry. The result is that we are forced to rely on the industry to
protect us from chemical abuses. We no longer have to care, the industry
will (supposedly) care for us.
In
researching the section, we quickly found that, in general, the industry
seems to know very little about the long term health effects of
the chemicals it uses, sometimes in huge volumes. Ignoring these environmental
considerations makes the wood products we use cheap, but they are cheap
at an environmental cost. Indeed, even where the hazards are well known,
as in the case of using wood treatment chemicals that destroy the ozone
layer, the industry argues that alternatives are "uneconomic",
and is reluctant to make any change. This is how the industry cares
for us. Such ways of thinking are truly amazing if we consider the fact
that, by not taking any action, we may be irreversibly damaging the
capacity of our ecological systems to sustain us.
in
the following sections we realise we are largely blowing the whistle
in relation to some of the chemicals used in the forest products industry.
Resolving the issues we raise will require huge amounts of careful research
and determined effort. It will require a major shift in our ways of
thinking about wood. For example, we are going to have to learn to consider
the cost of dealing with the harmful effects of our use of chemicals
as a normal part of the cost of the wood we purchase. In other words,
if we want to use chemically treated wood, we will also have to pay
for the environmental safeguards. if we do this, natural alternatives,
such as growing termite resistant timber species in our plantations,
will begin to look like viable investment propositions.
VOLATILE
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) are the organic solvents used to thin or reduce
gluey or sticky finishes so as to make them easier to apply. Large amounts
of VOCs are used in the wood products industry in Australia, particularly
in furniture manufacture where spray equipment is used for adhesive
application, moisture proofing, and final coatings. Some wood finishing
products may contain a number of different VOCs (e.g., toluene, xylene,
methyl ethyl ketone, benzene, etc.) and the exact formulation is confused
where brand names are used instead of chemical names. While the degree
of hazard these solvents represent varies, as a general rule they should
all be regarded as potentially hazardous.
We
are concerned about the use of VOCs for two primary reasons. First,
many VOCs, such as the chlorinated hydrocarbons, have been linked to
ozone destruction, photochemical smog and the greenhouse effect. Second,
VOCs can enter our bodies by being inhaled, swallowed, or through direct
skin contact. Such exposure has been associated with health problems
such as headaches, nausea, weakness, forgetfulness, respiratory irritations,
liver damage, dermatitis, sterility, foetal injury, and cancer.
Worksafe
Australia (1993) advised that the following common organic solvents
are known to cause, or are suspected of causing, cancer:
Benzene
Carbon
tetrachloride
Methylene
chloride
Epichlorohydrin
Formaldehyde
Perchloroethylene
Most
countries are moving to have these and other dangerous VOCs closely
controlled. In Australia, we often have no way of knowing if these substances
have been used in the wood products we purchase, nor the levels of the
materials that continue to be emitted from the product once it is installed
in our homes. This lack of information makes the purchase of substitutes,
such as waterborne lacquers or oils, a difficult process for the average
consumer.
Often
alternatives are just as poorly labelled, relying on meaningless statements
such as "environmentally friendly" instead of clear information.
If seeking more information about the use of VOCs, manufacturers are
required to issue specific product information in the form of a material
safety data sheet (MSDS). This is required to be freely available.
In
order to reduce the use of VOCs, we could substitute water based
solvents, or we could investigate alternative processes.
THE
CASE OF FORMALDEHYDE
One
of the most common volatile organic compounds we are likely to encounter
when working with wood is formaldehyde. Because its use is so common,
we have often been asked by readers whether the formaldehyde used in
wood products poses a health risk. This is a difficult question to answer
in a short section as any explanation depends on a number of interacting
factors operating over the life of the product. We cannot cover every
product, thus we will approach the question by explaining what formaldehyde
is, where it is used, the possible health effects, and what can be done
to minimise our exposure to any hazard.
WHAT
IS FORMALDEHYDE?
Formaldehyde
is a gas at room temperature and is a contaminant found in elevated
concentrations in indoor environments. The gas is emitted from pressed
wood products which use formaldehyde adhesives, binders, or wood finishes.
The gas may also be emitted from urea formaldehyde insulation,
fibreglass products, paper products, paints, exhaust fumes from engines
without catalytic converters, open fireplaces, cigarette smoke, carpeting,
and from a wide range of consumer products where formaldehyde is used
as a preservative (WHO 1989).
Pressed
wood products containing formaldehyde (e.g., MDF particle board and
plywood) find their way into the home or office as kitchen cabinets,
shelving, counters, built in wardrobes, bookcases, computer furniture,
table tops, flooring, lining, etc.. Most of the pressed wood materials
in question have only been relatively
recently developed, therefore new buildings, including recently renovated
buildings, will typically contain more formaldehyde emitting materials
than older buildings.
Formaldehyde
has become a health concern to timber consumers primarily because of
its increased use glued wood products. As we have already noted, on
the one hand, the use of these products is a positive development: it
reduces our reliance on solid timber and aids in waste minimisation.
On the other handthe high levels of formaldehyde in the air generally
correspond to the large formaldehyde releasing surface. areas of these
products. In other words, the more glued wood products we use, the more
likely high levels of the gas will be found. The higher the level of
the gas in the air, the more likely its presence is to be related to
adverse health effects. For example, mobile homes and caravans contain
a large amount of glued wood product and have been found to have a higher
load factor for formaldehyde than conventional homes.
THE
HEALTH EFFECTS
Formaldehyde
has always been found in low concentrations in our environment as a
consequence of natural processes, Today, however, formaldehyde is produced
industrially in huge quantities. As with many new industrial chemicals,
consumers are largely put in the position of being guinea pigs in order
to determine the safe levels of exposure. It is usually only when complaints
start to be lodged that scientists are dispatched to research the possible
cause of the complaints. This has been the case with the use of formaldehyde
in pressed wood products. The research was prompted by complaints that
linked elevated levels of formaldehyde to a wide range of health complaints.
Dr
Peter Dingle of Murdoch University has recently reviewed the scientific
literature and warns that:
Formaldehyde
is a strong respiratory irritant which causes eye, nose and throat irritation,
chronic coughing, asthma, shortness of breath, nausea and vomiting,
nose bleeds, headaches and dizziness, as well as skin rashes when contact
is on the skin. Other health effects associated with formaldehyde ate
a prickling irritation of the throat, headache, excessive thirst, tearing
and stinging of the eyes. Formaldehyde also has immunological effects
causing sensitisation and allergy, with skin being shown definitely
to exhibit allergy and the respiratory tract also possibly being affected
this way. A number of studies also show that neuro behavioural
effects, such as headache, nausea, memory loss, anorexia and psychological
changes, occur upon exposure to formaldehyde.
We
also know that formaldehyde has been identified by the International
Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as a Group 2A substance, "probably
carcinogenic to humans'. Similarly, Worksafe Australia has classed formaldehyde
as a Category 2 substance, a "probable human carcinogen".
Given such warnings, most experts agree that it is prudent to minimise
our exposure to formaldehyde.
MINIMISING
EXPOSURE
Perhaps
the greatest barrier to minimising exposure to formaldehyde in Australia
is the absence of information on emissions for the buyer at the point
of sale. While regulations to control the emissions of formaldehyde
from wood based products have been introduced overseas, Australia lags
behind. In some countries, consumers are notified whether the product
they are considering contains formaldehyde and, if it does, whether
the amount is within agreed safe limits. In Australia, we have no way
of knowing and must trust the industry to self regulate.
Given
the wide spread use of formaldehyde in pressed wood products, and
a reliance on industry self regulation, the issue of what is a safe
amount of formaldehyde to be exposed to is highly contentious and problematic.
For example, in Australia the guideline is 100 ppb (parts per billion),
the World Health Organization has set a guideline of 82 ppb, while
Canada and California have set a guideline of 50 ppb (Godish et al.
1995).
The
matter is further complicated by the fact that exposure to formaldehyde
mainly occurs when the_ product is first installed. The release of formaldehyde
from pressed wood products and other sources is known
to decrease exponentially with time, with maximum formaldehyde offgassing
in the first months to the first year. Research has found that formaldehyde
levels are reduced by approximately half within the first three weeks
when the product is installed in a well ventilated area.
It
would appear from our review that there are three main options to avoid
the harmful effects of exposure to formaldehyde.
First, avoid formaldehyde
by purchasing products that do not contain it. As we have noted, this
is problematic as the products are not always labelled. Further, solid
wood alternatives use more quality timber and, therefore, are more expensive.
Second, choose materials
that contain as little free formaldehyde as possible. For example, resins
that contain phenol formaldehyde rather than urea formaldehyde
have been found to have much lower emission rates. Also worth noting here
is that imported rainforest plywoods generally have higher rates of offgassing
than locally produced plantation products. Once again, however, we have
to point out that it is difficult for consumers to find this information
out. There is a need for labelling scheme for both locally and imported
materials.
Third, make best use
of ventilation. Indoor ventilation is the main agent for the reduction
of formaldehyde levels. if we suspect our newly constructed or renovated
home contains materials containing formaldehyde, open the windows and
get some air through. Consider not moving in until the building has been
thoroughly ventilated. Similarly, if working in an area where formaldehyde
is used, or where formaldehyde offgassing materials are stored in large
quantities, ensure proper ventilation and minimise direct exposure to
gas fumes.
TERMITE
CONTROL
Subterranean
termites cause most of the termite damage to timber in Australia (French
1991). The most commonly used protection from subterranean termites
has been a soil chemical barrier (e.g., aldrin, dieldrin, chlordane
or heptachlor). There is widespread concern that the use of such termiticides
contaminates the environment, and may harm species other than the targeted
termites (French 1994).
Concerns
over the use of toxic, persistent chemicals, such as the organochlorines,
has led to many of the chemicals used being banned, leaving the pest
control industry reliant on a handful of chemical treatments. This situation
illustrates some of the dangers and limitations inherent in chemically
based approaches to timber use.
Some
thought as to how to protect timber without the use of chemical barriers
has lead the CSIRO to develop a non toxic product called Granitgard.
The use of this product avoids the need to spray dangerous residual
poisons under buildings. Granitgard is like a gravel and forms a non toxic
barrier to protect slab, strip footing and stumps. The particles of
the product are too small for the, termites to crawl through, too heavy
and too large for them to carry, and too hard for them to chew.
Thinking
like a termite led the CSIRO to an interesting solution. There are many
other ways to avoid the need for dangerous chemical treatments for termite
control. For example, another barrier method is TermiMesh, a flexible
stainless steel mesh which termites cannot penetrate. For a good reference,
Robert Verkerk (1990) has written a book called Building Out Termites.
In this book the author explains how to build termite resistant buildings,
how to modify existing buildings to make them less likely to be attacked,
and how to conduct systematic inspection routines.
METHYL
BROMIDE FUMIGATION
Methyl
bromide is used in Australia to fumigate imported or exported logs,
timber, wood chips and a variety of other wooden products. The fumigation
is required under international quarantine regulations and may be carried
out as part of a routine system, or may be ordered as the result of
the detection of pests. Forest products are fumigated to restrict the
spread of these pests and to prevent damage to the wood product itself.
Treatments are carried out under tarpaulins, in the holds of ships,
or in containers (i.e., under circumstance far from 'air tight').
Methyl
bromide was listed as an ozone depleting substance by the Fourth
Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete
the Ozone Layer (UNEP 1994). This means that, owing to the serious environmental
concerns surrounding the use of methyl bromide, Australians should make
every effort to reduce emissions of, and to recover, recycle and reclaim,
methyl bromide.
Despite
a wide variety of substitute, processes being available, methyl bromide
is still extensively used in Australia. As a result, large quantities
of methyl bromide are still being released into the atmosphere. Indeed,
the 'enclosed space" fumigation of timber has been estimated to
result in up to 88 per cent of the methyl bromide used being released
into the atmosphere (UNEP 1994). This
unacceptably high discharge rate occurs because methyl bromide is absorbed
by woody materials during fumigation and then released over time. Other
significant discharges occur owing to leaks and intentional venting
(UNEP 1994).
Our
actions in respect to the fumigation of wood may be contributing to
the worsening of ozone depletion and the greenhouse effect. We can avoid
participating in this process by choosing wood products that are grown
locally. If we maintain the health of our local bioregions and use them
for wood production, there will be less need to fumigate our wood. Those
working with methyl bromide should keep in mind that the National Occupational
Health and Safety Commission has listed it as being hazardous. The inhalation
of a concentration of methyl bromide above 100 parts per million *can
be fatal" (Occupational Safety and Health Service 1992).
PRESERVATIVE
TREATMENTS FOR WOOD
Some
timbers are subject to attack by insects and termites and may decay
owing to the action of fungi or certain micro organisms. This
is especially the case in hot and humid climates, or whenever timber
comes into contact with the ground. To overcome these problems a preservative
treatment for the timber might be considered. Recent service tests conducted
by CSIRO have indicated that treated pine is performing better in ground
contact than the most durable hardwood.
There
are six main groups of preservatives on the market: creosotes, CCAs,
light organic solvent preservatives (LOSPs), brush on coatings,
ACQ and a new product called copper azole preservative.
CREOSOTE
Creosote
is a heavy duty timber preservative, traditionally used in industrial
applications such as bridge and wharf timbers, electricity poles, railway
sleepers and marine pilings. The traditional creosote treatment gave
timber a black, oily appearance and a strong tar based odour. This
vapour could irritate the eyes and skin.
A
new creosote treatment, known as PEC creosote (pigment emulsified creosote),
has recently been developed jointly by CSIRO and Koppers. PEC
creosote retains the advantages of traditional creosote but,
in addition, it is dry to touch, more resistant to leaching out of the
timber, and releases less vapour. It is light brown in colour rather
than black.
Creosote
typically contains over 150 chemicals, some of which are known carcinogens
(Occupational Safety and Health Service 1992).
Creosote products are banned for domestic use in the United States
of America because of suspicions about carcinogenicity and birth defects.
Given such concerns, workers applying traditional creosote, or the more
recent PEC creosote, should take
precautions to avoid both long or shortterm exposure. We also
note that little information in currently available as to acceptable
methods to dispose of creosote treated wood and for these reasons
we can not recommend creosote as a eco friendly timber treatment.
The
Good Wood and Paper Guide FRIENDS OF THE EARTH 1999